Well, I’ve been doing a bit of research into selling silver items on ebay and have noticed a few things which may help to maximise the final valuation on listings. I’m not sure about the psychology behind it, having read a couple of academic articles about the psychology of selling on ebay.
I’ve sold a few things on ebay in my time and have put starting prices to reflect an absolute minimum that I would want to accept for whatever the item is (I sold a lot of camera lenses in the past and am currently listing a few smaller pieces of silver). I recently sold a C19th mahogany scotch chest which I just needed to get out of the house. I was going to get rid of it to a charity shop which sell large pieces of furniture but instead thought I would list it up at 99p start. I thought that whoever would collect it would be doing me a favour so I wasn’t really all that bothered about getting much cash for it. By the end of the auction, it had 60 watchers, the page had 350+ views and it went for about £90. That’s not too bad, considering that I wouldn’t think it would attract much attention – the chest was is fair condition, but it wasn’t anything special.
While I was listing my items yesterday, I decided to start them at 99p each. Anyone interested can see my listed items here. Having finished listing them I had a quick look at one of my saved searches for hallmarked silver. There were quite a few big lots which were going for some good money. I had a look at the bids and lo & behold, the seller had started them all at 99p. These were lots which were worth a few hundred pounds. And the final prices were in the hundreds of pounds. Now, they were very good lots. Museum pieces, some of them, so not in the same league as my little list. The lesson that I found very hard to learn was that if you’re trying to sell a high-value piece on ebay, it’s a better idea to list it with a very low start price than the minimum price you’d like to get.
In the past I have started items out at something near their actual value and found it hard for them to get started. Maybe the very low start price gets people interested and encourages them to start watching and then bidding. Once you have their interest, they become involved with the auction and find it easier to bid and easier to bid to higher levels. This is just a little theory of mine and I will find out at the end of the week whether my approach has worked. Of course, in the true spirit of science, I’m going to say that “more research needs to be done”. Here’s hoping that my theory works…..
Furniture is something that most of us will buy at some point throughout our lives. As we use furniture, it becomes, well… used I suppose. Article of furniture are not something that we tend to replace every year, but perhaps every few years. with the need to be more flexible in the employment market, we sometimes find that we’ll move a bit more often than our parents might have done. This habit of moving house frequently saw a high point in the property boom with families and individuals moving up the property ladder. These moving points create opportunities for refreshing interior design and buying furniture. What worked in the old house may not necessarily work in the new house. All this leads me to champion the case for buying furniture at auction, over new furniture from a retailer.
There is a perception that antique furniture is elite and expensive but this need not necessarily be the case. Some high-end antiques are always going to cost more than new high-street furniture, but I’m not comparing like with like in that case. Modern reproduction furniture can often be found at auction houses for a fraction of its original cost. I remember one of the first auction I attended in Yorkshire. I could have bought an elegant regency reproduction extending dining table in mahogany veneer for £60. Add six matching reproduction dining chairs with a pair of carver chairs for another £60. With the buyer’s premium and VAT, that’s a dining table and eight chairs for well under £200. No-one bid on either of these items and they left the auction house unsold. I would have bid on them, had I had the space in my own house to accommodate them. As it is, my own house is almost entirely furnished with antique and vintage pieces of furniture, gathered from auction houses, antique shops and even eBay sellers over the last ten years or so.
As with most interior designs, antique furniture goes through trends and buying the right pieces at the right time can save an enormous amount of money, as well as giving your interior a unique and personal appearance. That doesn’t mean that you have to settle for an interior inspired by the bilge spouted by that Grand Dame of hypocrisy and shabby chic tat, Kirsty Allsop (I cite her hypocrisy in that, after years of espousing bland beige identikit interiors and modern “clean” furniture, she now completely decries her past and is advising those bereft of any inspiration (or ability to think on their own) how to give their homes an individual look). There is absolutely no reason why antique (or even modern reproduction) furniture couldn’t work with ultra-modern interior designs. This is the age of post-modern bricolage and pastiche. The inclusion of one or two choice pieces of antique furniture in a modern loft conversion, for example, would emphasise both the antique nature of the furniture and the contemporary milieu in which is it placed.
As I write, in early 2012, the fashion for heavy Victorian “brown” furniture is in the middle of a slump which has lasted maybe four or five years already. Interiors just aren’t happy with the heavy and dark woods and imposing forms of Victorian pieces. I should insert a caveat at this point, as some high-end pieces are still in demand and have held their prices well. This means that you can pick up many useful and decorative pieces of furniture for very little indeed, and for significantly less than the price of a new piece of furniture. Need a desk for the laptop, which needs to be useful and not take up too much space? What about a writing bureau? Or a Victorian Davenport? Or an Edwardian writing table? This is just one example of how antique furniture can fulfil the needs of modern life. The less austere Edwardian period produced elegant furniture which was smaller, lighter and softer than the high Victorian period and perhaps more suitable for modern life. Why settle for that hideous piece of soulless flatpack furniture from the land of interior furnishings and Swedish meatballs?
Another point to consider is the resale value of antique versus the resale value of new. The moment you take delivery of that new piece of furniture, it will lose probably ⅔ of its value. In the short-medium term, an antique piece will mostly hold its resale value or even increase in value (unless you are unfortunate to buy just before a market slump hits). Most people don’t even consider the idea of resale value when buying furniture, but its something that I try to take into account.
The major sticking point that I think people have with antique furniture is knowledge. There are so many periods and styles of antique furniture that the whole idea of buying antique can seem impenetrably complicated. This needn’t be the case. I’m by no means an antique furniture expert (I know a furniture restorer and I’m constantly befuddled by what pieces belong to what periods), but I can see what works visually and functionally. If you can see something having a use and fitting in with your interior decor, and have the time to browse the auction houses’ online catalogues, you’re probably about 90% there. Take the plunge and go to an auction.